The Victorian poem, The Walrus and the Carpenter, by Lewis Carroll offers a cautionary tale about how gullible people can be in the face of extravagant promises from those in positions of power. The Walrus, who is a bigger and more imposing figure than the Carpenter, befriends a group of vulnerable oysters, preys upon their trust, and convinces them to accompany him and his partner, the Carpenter, to go on a walk.
The Walrus’ sweet-talk is misleading and the poor oysters are soon eaten up by the duo.
The poem is meant to illustrate how easy it is for those in power to take advantage of the vulnerable and unwary. It serves as a warning against blindly believing in the words of those in positions of authority – even if they come with promising offers that may initially appear too good to be true.
This can be seen in today’s society, particularly as it relates to certain business or investment opportunities that may not have people’s best interests at heart.
The underlying lesson of the poem is twofold: first, it teaches us to be more cautious and discerning when accepting offers from those in authority and, second, it encourages us to advocate for the rights of the vulnerable by standing up for those in need.
This serves as a reminder of the importance of standing up for what is right.
What was the real intention of The Walrus and the Carpenter How did they achieve it?
The Walrus and the Carpenter, featured in Lewis Carroll’s poem The Walrus and the Carpenter, is a fable about two characters who attempt to manipulate some oysters into joining them for a stroll along the beach.
The Walrus is depicted as the mastermind, with the Carpenter playing the role of the gullible follower.
The Walrus’s true intention is to eat the oysters for dinner, a fact that the Carpenter does not recognize initially. The Walrus uses charm, flattery and logical persuasion to convince the oysters to join them.
He promises them a pleasant evening stroll, and the opportunity to “view the mullioned and the towering steep”. He cleverly invents the notion that the oysters have been “exiled” from their beds and that he and the Carpenter are their only hope of finding a new place to settle down.
Ultimately, the Walrus uses his persuasive rhetoric to achieve his real intention of enticing the oysters to serve as a meal for the pair. He and the Carpenter manage to sway the oysters with the false promise of a moonlit walk along the shore, and the majority fall for the Walrus’s scheme.
It is only at the end of the poem that the Carpenter realizes the truth and remarks, “I weep for you, they were so young. ” Overall, the Walrus and the Carpenter manage to accomplish their real intention of convincing the oysters to unwittingly walk into a trap and serve as a meal.
What subjects did the Walrus suggest they should talk about?
The Walrus suggested that they should talk about a variety of things. He suggested discussing topics related to politics, art, music, literature, science, and history. He suggested debating the merits of certain ideas and learning how to form compelling arguments.
He also suggested talking about things of a more personal nature, such as finding meaning in life, learning how to cope with emotional issues, and understanding the importance of relationships. Ultimately, he wanted them to engage in a meaningful dialogue in order to help them become better, more informed individuals.
Is The Walrus and the Carpenter about religion?
No, The Walrus and the Carpenter is not about religion. It is a poem by Lewis Carroll, published in 1872 in his book Through the Looking-Glass and What Alice Found There. The poem tells the story of a walking tour taken by the Walrus and the Carpenter upon a beach where they encounter a group of oysters.
The Walrus and the Carpenter are very persuasive in attempting to lure the oysters away, although they eventually fail. While the poem is a whimsical tale, it can be viewed allegorically as a commentary on social class and the behavior of the wealthy.
Carroll often used his works to comment on the Victorian-era establishment and the unfair practices of the upper class. Therefore, while The Walrus and the Carpenter is not explicitly religious in its themes, it can be seen as a commentary on morality and justice as experienced in the Victorian era.
What is the moral of the carpenter story?
The moral of the Carpenter story is that with hard work and determination, anyone can be successful. It is a reminder to stay focused on goals and to continue striving for greatness, no matter the obstacles and challenges that may come your way.
The story encourages us to take full advantage of our talents and abilities, and to use them to create something extraordinary and meaningful. It also encourages us to never give up, as if we persist, even in difficult times, we can still reach our goals and achieve greatness.
Was Jesus called a carpenter?
Yes, Jesus was referred to as a carpenter. In the Bible, his father, Joseph, is described as a carpenter, and several of Jesus’ disciples were also professional carpenters.
The term “carpenter” seems to primarily be used to refer to Jesus as well as his disciples, though it is likely that Jesus had a variety of skills in the construction and carpentry trade. The term “tekton” which is used in the New Testament Greek is often translated as “carpenter” within modern English translations.
The data surrounding Jesus’ trade is limited, as the Bible does not provide many details about Jesus’ day to day activities. However, it is likely that he did work in the carpentry trade due to his association with other carpenters such as his father and disciples.
In some circles, Jesus is also called the Master Carpenter, referring to the notion that his divine power is to help mankind build something lasting and beautiful. This metaphor is often applied to the idea that the follower of Jesus should strive to build a life that is meaningful and purposeful.
What does Bruce Lincoln say about religion?
In his book Religion, Empire, and Torture: The Case of Achaemenid Persia, Bruce Lincoln examines the intersection of religion and politics in the Achaemenid Persian Empire. Lincoln argues that religion, particularly Zoroastrianism, was an important tool of governance—one used to both legitimize power and advance the interests of rulers.
Specifically, Lincoln details how religious ideas were employed to control public behavior, to win over the support of subject peoples, and to organize military campaigns. He also argues that certain ways of thinking about the divine—particularly emphasizing notions of retribution and the struggle between good and evil—were used to justify the use of torture and other forms of violence against enemies of the state.
Overall, Lincoln suggests that religion was a potent and often dangerous force that was constantly manipulated and reshaped in the pursuit of imperial goals.
What did Jesse Ventura say about organized religion?
Jesse Ventura, the former Governor of Minnesota, provided insight into his views on organized religion in an interview with Rob Bell in 2017. In the interview, he stated that organized religion is more of a social manipulation and control tactic than something to believe in.
He further expressed his belief that the institution of organized religion serves those in power, distorting doctrine and spreading superstition to control their flock. He elaborated in saying that, “organized religion is created by the people in power, they use it to manipulate the populous while they stay in control, like a puppet master.
Ventura believes that religion has impacted history in a predominantly negative fashion and that it has been used to justify countless wars and injustices. He went on to suggest that the reason so much suffering comes as a result of organized religion is that it is not about faith or inner connection, but about those in power keeping their influence.
He cautions that the more people become deluded by promises of the afterlife, the more real life suffering will be caused by organized religion.
What is the poem the walrus said?
The poem “The Walrus Said” was written by Lewis Carroll and is a part of his poem, “The Walrus and the Carpenter,” which was featured in his 1865 classic Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland. The poem tells the story of two characters, the Walrus and the Carpenter, who were walking along a beach one evening, gathering oysters.
As the sun slowly sets, the two decide to take a break and share a meal of their collected meal, much to the dismay of the oysters, who realize they are being eaten.
The Walrus then speaks to the oysters in a sorrowful and sympathizing manner. In the poem, he says:
“O Oysters, come and walk with us!”
The Walrus did beseech.
A pleasant walk, a pleasant talk,
Along the briny beach:
We couldn’t have a nicer day
For a walk on the sand
And maybe find another oyster
For another round of meal.
The Walrus’ kind words, although they appear noble and kind, are ultimately a self-serving tactic to get the oysters to go with them. Although the Walrus seems genuine and kindhearted, his actions are less than noble, as he and the Carpenter ultimately eat the oysters for their meal.
The poem is a fantastic example of Lewis Carroll’s skill as a writer, as he uses humor and lightheartedness to present a deeper story about human behavior and the dangers of false sincerity. The poem offers an inspiring message of kindness even in the face of selfishness.
What is the main tone of the poem?
The main tone of the poem is one of introspection and contemplation. This is evidenced by the imagery of the poem, which typically invokes a sense of deep and reflective thought. The poem focuses on the speaker’s reflections on life, ranging from the solemn and profound to the bittersweet and melancholic.
The speaker wonders about the big questions of life and grapples with the various experiences it brings him. Despite this underlying melancholic tone, there is also a hopefulness expressed in the poem, as the speaker reflects on the potential of life.
The poem speaks to the fragility of life and how we can find strength in embracing the unknown. Ultimately, the poem creates a tone of wistful introspection and contemplation of our journey through life.
Why does the walrus cry after eating the oysters?
The real reason why the walrus cries after eating the oysters is actually unknown, though there are many theories as to why this may occur. It is possible that the walrus is overwrought with emotion once it realizes that it has eaten the oysters, and its tears are an expression of remorse.
Another theory is that after consuming the oysters, the walrus experiences a surge of oxytocin, which is known to produce sensations of pleasure and attachment—thus resulting in tears of joy or satisfaction.
Other theories suggest that the walrus’s tears may be a reaction to the taste of the oysters, or potential allergens contained within the oyster’s flesh. Ultimately, the exact cause of the walrus’ tears remains a mystery.
What strategy does the walrus use to dismiss the truth?
The walrus often uses a strategy of distraction, deflection, and defensiveness to dismiss the truth. When faced with evidence or facts that contradict their point of view, they may attempt to draw attention away from the evidence or facts by using tactics such as humor, mockery, aggression, or attacking the person making the claim.
They may also make up excuses, denials, or misinformation to defend their position. Additionally, they may try to create confusion by providing false information or making unsubstantiated claims or assumptions about the evidence or facts.
The goal is to overwhelm or confuse the person with whom they are arguing, in order to avoid having to confront the truth or accept responsibility for the issue at hand.
Why does the walrus cry in Alice in Wonderland?
The walrus in Alice in Wonderland cries due to the anguish it feels from being ignored and neglected. Throughout the film, the walrus looks very longing and unhappy, likely in anticipation of not being noticed by Alice.
There is a scene where the walrus cries so hard that a large tear falls onto Alice’s arm. This, coupled with other instances of crying, represents the walrus’s sadness. Additionally, the walrus and the Carpenter whom he is in conversation with, represent two very different characters that clash in personality, which adds to the walrus’s misery.
The walrus is a kind and gentle character who is not getting the attention he needs, which leads to his sad and lonely state.
Why did the walrus weep?
The walrus wept for a variety of reasons, ranging from loneliness and heartache to physical pain. One of the most common reasons for a walrus to cry is due to separation from its mother. A mother walrus typically cares for her calf for up to two years before the calf is able to survive on its own and is weaned from its mother.
This separation can be devastating for both the calf and the mother and often results in the calf whimpering and crying out of pain and heartache. Aside from being separated from its mother, a walrus may cry due to hunger and thirst, extreme temperatures, physical pain such as wounds, or if it has been injured by a predator.
Additionally, walruses are capable of forming strong emotional attachments to other animals of their species, and may be affected by the death or separation of a close companion. As highly emotive animals, walruses may also cry in response to sadness, joy or even as a form of communication with other animals.
How does the walrus feel at the end?
At the end of the story, the walrus feels very content. He has a newfound appreciation for the joys of life and the simple pleasures that it can bring. He has finally accepted his place in the world and has made a connection with the other creatures that inhabit it.
The shared experiences between the walrus, owl, and the butterfly make him feel a great deal of joy and satisfaction. He feels satisfied that he has made a true connection with those around him and is now able to take in the beauty of the world without worrying about being different.
The walrus is content and has a newfound appreciation for life.